程序仍有问题

This commit is contained in:
2025-11-05 08:36:42 +08:00
parent b6a9feddc7
commit b1ba96b691
6 changed files with 1394 additions and 189 deletions
+510
View File
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+18 -18
View File
@@ -17,29 +17,29 @@ $$
### k <-> k+1 ### k <-> k+1
1. Birth move 1. Birth move
$$ 辅助变量的先验:$u~U\left( -1,1 \right) $
\log R=\log \frac{P\left( x_{k+1} \right) P\left( y|x_{k+1} \right)}{P\left( x_k \right) P\left( y|x_k \right)}+\log \frac{P\left( dead \right)}{P\left( birth \right)}+\log \frac{\small{\frac{1}{k+1}}}{q\left( u \right)}+\log \left| J_1 \right| 提议分布:$q\left( \lambda _k,\lambda _{k+1} \right) =q\left( u \right) \cdot P\left( birth \right) $
$$ 接受率:$\alpha \left( \lambda _k,\lambda _{k+1} \right) =\min \left\{ 1,\frac{P\left( \lambda _{k+1} \right) P\left( y|\lambda _{k+1} \right)}{P\left( \lambda _k \right) P\left( y|\lambda _k \right)}\cdot \frac{P\left( dead \right)}{P\left( birth \right)}\cdot \frac{\small{\frac{1}{k+1}}}{q\left( u \right)}\cdot \left| J_1 \right| \right\} $
缩放因子:$\left| J_1 \right|=1$
2. Death move 2. Death move
$$ 辅助变量的先验:$\frac{1}{k+1} $
\log R=\log \frac{P\left( x_k \right) P\left( y|x_k \right)}{P\left( x_{k+1} \right) P\left( y|x_{k+1} \right)}+\log \frac{P\left( birth \right)}{P\left( dead \right)}+\log \frac{\small{q\left( u \right)}}{\frac{1}{k+1}}-\log \left| J_1 \right| 提议分布:$q\left( \lambda _{k+1},\lambda _k \right) =\frac{1}{k+1}\cdot P\left( dead \right) $
$$ 接受率:$\alpha \left( \lambda _{k+1},\lambda _k \right) =\min \left\{ 1,\frac{P\left( \lambda _k \right) P\left( y|\lambda _k \right)}{P\left( \lambda _{k+1} \right) P\left( y|\lambda _{k+1} \right)}\cdot \frac{P\left( birth \right)}{P\left( dead \right)}\cdot \frac{q\left( u \right)}{\frac{1}{k+1}}\cdot \frac{1}{\left| J_1 \right|} \right\} $
缩放因子:$\left| J_1 \right|=1$
### k <-> k+2 ### k <-> k+2
1. Birth move 1. Birth move
$$ 映射关系: $\lambda _1,\lambda _2,\cdots \lambda _k,\theta ,\rho \longrightarrow \lambda _1,\lambda _2,\cdots \lambda _k,\lambda _{k+1},\lambda _{k+2}$ 其中: $\lambda _{k+1}=\rho \left( \cos \theta +i\sin \theta \right) $, $\lambda _{k+2}=\rho \left( \cos \theta -i\sin \theta \right) $
\log R=\log \frac{P\left( x_{k+2} \right) P\left( y|x_{k+2} \right)}{P\left( x_k \right) P\left( y|x_k \right)}+\log \frac{P\left( dead \right)}{P\left( birth \right)}+\log \frac{\small{\frac{1}{m+1}}}{q\left( \theta \right) q\left( r \right)}+\log \left| J_2 \right| 辅助变量的先验: $\theta ~U\left( 0,\pi \right) ;\rho ~U\left( 0,1 \right) $
$$ 提议分布:$ q\left( \lambda _k,\lambda _{k+1} \right) =\frac{\small{1}}{q\left( \theta \right) q\left( \rho \right)}\cdot P\left( birth \right) $
接受率:$\alpha \left( \lambda _k,\lambda _{k+1} \right) =\min \left\{ 1,\frac{P\left( \lambda _{k+2} \right) P\left( y|\lambda _{k+2} \right)}{P\left( \lambda _k \right) P\left( y|\lambda _k \right)}\cdot \frac{P\left( dead \right)}{P\left( birth \right)}\cdot \frac{\small{\frac{1}{k+1}}}{q\left( \theta \right) q\left( \rho \right)}\cdot \left| J_2 \right| \right\} $
缩放因子: $$ \left| J_2 \right|=\left| \det \left( \frac{\partial \left( \lambda _1,\lambda _2,\cdots \lambda _k,\lambda _{k+1},\lambda _{k+2} \right)}{\partial \left( \lambda _1,\lambda _2,\cdots \lambda _k,\theta ,\rho \right)} \right) \right|=\left| \det \left( \begin{matrix}\cos \theta +i\sin \theta&-\rho \sin \theta +i\rho \cos \theta\\\cos \theta -i\sin \theta&-\rho \sin \theta -i\rho \cos \theta\\\end{matrix} \right) \right|=2\rho $$
2. Death move 2. Death move
$$ 辅助变量的先验: $\frac{1}{k+1}$
\log R=\log \frac{P\left( x_k \right) P\left( y|x_k \right)}{P\left( x_{k+2} \right) P\left( y|x_{k+2} \right)}+\log \frac{P\left( birth \right)}{P\left( dead \right)}+\log \frac{\small{q\left( \theta \right) q\left( r \right)}}{\frac{1}{m+1}}-\log \left| J_2 \right| 提议分布:$ q\left( \lambda _{k+1},\lambda _k \right) =\frac{1}{k+1}\cdot P\left( dead \right) $
$$ 接受率:$\log R=\log \frac{P\left( x_k \right) P\left( y|x_k \right)}{P\left( x_{k+1} \right) P\left( y|x_{k+1} \right)}+\log \frac{P\left( birth \right)}{P\left( dead \right)}+\log \frac{q\left( \theta \right) q\left( \rho \right)}{\frac{1}{k+1}}-\log \left| J_1 \right| $
缩放因子: $$ \left| J_2 \right|=\left| \det \left( \frac{\partial \left( \lambda _1,\lambda _2,\cdots \lambda _k,\lambda _{k+1},\lambda _{k+2} \right)}{\partial \left( \lambda _1,\lambda _2,\cdots \lambda _k,\theta ,\rho \right)} \right) \right|=\left| \det \left( \begin{matrix}\cos \theta +i\sin \theta&-\rho \sin \theta +i\rho \cos \theta\\\cos \theta -i\sin \theta&-\rho \sin \theta -i\rho \cos \theta\\\end{matrix} \right) \right|=2\rho $$
$其中 m$ 是当前系统中复共轭极点对的数量
$J_1$ 和 $J_2$ 是雅可比矩阵行列式
$\left| J_1 \right|=\left| \prod_{\boldsymbol{i}=1}^{\boldsymbol{k}}{\left( \lambda _i-u_i \right)} \right|$
$\left| J_2 \right|=\left| \prod_{\boldsymbol{i}=1}^{\boldsymbol{k}}{\left( \lambda _{k+1}-\lambda _i \right) \left( \lambda _{k+2}-\lambda _i \right)} \right|\left| \lambda _{k+1}-\lambda _{k+1} \right|$
## 同维度游动 ## 同维度游动
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ a=\frac{r_1+r_2}{2}\text{、}b=\frac{r_1-r_2}{2}
r_1=a+b\text{、}r_2=a-b r_1=a+b\text{、}r_2=a-b
$$ $$
再确定雅可比矩阵行列式 再确定雅可比矩阵行列式
$$ $$
J_{C\rightarrow R}=\left| \det \left( \begin{matrix} J_{C\rightarrow R}=\left| \det \left( \begin{matrix}
\frac{\partial a}{\partial r_1}& \frac{\partial a}{\partial r_2}\\ \frac{\partial a}{\partial r_1}& \frac{\partial a}{\partial r_2}\\
+468 -152
View File
@@ -48,8 +48,10 @@ class RJMCMC_Sampler:
self.lambda_b_z = 1e-3 self.lambda_b_z = 1e-3
# 初始化噪声方差 (从先验采样) # 初始化噪声方差 (从先验采样)
self.current_sigma2_w = 1.0 / np.random.gamma(self.lambda_a_w, 1.0/self.lambda_b_w) # 为避免除零错误,在分母上增加一个极小值
self.current_sigma2_z = 1.0 / np.random.gamma(self.lambda_a_z, 1.0/self.lambda_b_z) epsilon = 1e-9
self.current_sigma2_w = 1.0 / (np.random.gamma(self.lambda_a_w, 1.0/self.lambda_b_w) + epsilon)
self.current_sigma2_z = 1.0 / (np.random.gamma(self.lambda_a_z, 1.0/self.lambda_b_z) + epsilon)
def _update_current_eigenvalues(self): def _update_current_eigenvalues(self):
@@ -59,6 +61,16 @@ class RJMCMC_Sampler:
self.current_eigenvalues = np.roots(poly_coeffs) self.current_eigenvalues = np.roots(poly_coeffs)
else: else:
self.current_eigenvalues = np.array([]) self.current_eigenvalues = np.array([])
def _update_current_a_coeffs(self):
"""一个辅助函数,根据 current_eigenvalues 更新 current_a。"""
k = len(self.current_eigenvalues)
if k > 0:
# np.poly 返回 [1, a_{k-1}, ..., a_0],去掉首项“1”,反转剩下的
poly_coeffs = np.poly(self.current_eigenvalues)
self.current_a = np.real(poly_coeffs[1:][::-1])
else:
self.current_a = np.array([])
def _cal_current_eigenvalues(self, a_coeffs_temp): def _cal_current_eigenvalues(self, a_coeffs_temp):
"""一个辅助函数,根据给定的 a_coeffs 计算对应的特征值。""" """一个辅助函数,根据给定的 a_coeffs 计算对应的特征值。"""
@@ -206,7 +218,7 @@ class RJMCMC_Sampler:
# --- 计算似然 --- # --- 计算似然 ---
# 预测误差 nu_t # 预测误差 nu_t
y_pred = C @ x_pred + D @ u_t y_pred = C @ x_pred + D @ np.array([[u_t]])
nu_t = y_t - y_pred nu_t = y_t - y_pred
# 预测误差协方差 S_t # 预测误差协方差 S_t
@@ -228,7 +240,7 @@ class RJMCMC_Sampler:
P_update = I_KC @ P_pred @ I_KC.T + K_t @ Gamma @ K_t.T P_update = I_KC @ P_pred @ I_KC.T + K_t @ Gamma @ K_t.T
# --- 为下一次循环准备预测 (t+1) --- # --- 为下一次循环准备预测 (t+1) ---
x_pred = A @ x_update + B @ u_t x_pred = A @ x_update + B @ np.array([[u_t]])
P_pred = A @ P_update @ A.T + Sigma P_pred = A @ P_update @ A.T + Sigma
return total_log_likelihood # 返回标量值 return total_log_likelihood # 返回标量值
@@ -241,6 +253,14 @@ class RJMCMC_Sampler:
k = self.current_k k = self.current_k
current_eigs = self.current_eigenvalues current_eigs = self.current_eigenvalues
# 获取实数特征值数目
real_eigs_indices = np.where(np.isreal(current_eigs))
num_real_eigs = len(real_eigs_indices[0])
# 获取复数特征值数目,只保留 imag > 0 的部分 (共轭对只算一次)
complex_eigs_indices = np.where((np.iscomplex(current_eigs)) & (current_eigs.imag > 0)) #type: ignore
num_complex_eigs = len(complex_eigs_indices[0])
# 决定是诞生一个实数根还是一对复共轭根 # 决定是诞生一个实数根还是一对复共轭根
can_add_complex = (k + 2) <= self.k_max can_add_complex = (k + 2) <= self.k_max
add_real = True add_real = True
@@ -252,33 +272,51 @@ class RJMCMC_Sampler:
if add_real: if add_real:
k_new = k + 1 k_new = k + 1
# 诞生实根的对数概率之比
log_birth_real_forward = np.log(0.5)
log_birth_real_backward = np.log(0.5)
# 从提议分布 q(u) 中采样辅助变量 u = (u_lambda, u_b) # 从提议分布 q(u) 中采样辅助变量 u = (u_lambda, u_b)
u_lambda = np.random.uniform(-1.0, 1.0) # 新特征值 u_lambda = np.random.uniform(-1.0, 1.0) # 新特征值
u_b = np.random.normal(0, 1) # 新 b 系数 u_b = np.random.normal(0, 1) # 新 b 系数
# 计算对数提议密度 log(q(u)) # 计算对数提议密度
log_q_forward = -np.log(2.0) + stats.norm.logpdf(u_b, 0, 1) log_q_forward = log_birth_real_forward + stats.norm.logpdf(u_b, 0, 1) - np.log(2.0)
log_q_backward = log_birth_real_backward - np.log(num_real_eigs + 1)
# 计算对数雅可比行列式 log|J| # 计算对数雅可比行列式 log|J|
if k == 0: if k == 0:
log_det_jacobian = 0.0 log_det_jacobian = 0.0
else: else:
log_det_jacobian = np.sum(np.log(np.abs(current_eigs - u_lambda))) log_det_jacobian = 1
# 构造新状态 # 构造新状态
new_eigs = np.append(current_eigs, u_lambda) new_eigs = np.append(current_eigs, u_lambda)
new_a = np.real(np.poly(new_eigs)[1:][::-1]) new_a = np.real(np.poly(new_eigs)[1:][::-1])
new_b = np.append(self.current_b, u_b) new_b = np.append(self.current_b, u_b)
# 接受率中的项为 |J| / q(u),在对数空间中为 log|J| - log(q(u)) # 接受率中的项为 q_backward(u) * |J| / q_forward(u)
log_ratio = log_det_jacobian - log_q_forward log_ratio = log_q_backward + log_det_jacobian - log_q_forward
return {"k_new": k_new, "a_new": new_a, "b_new": new_b, "log_ratio": log_ratio, "type": "birth_real", "new_eigs": new_eigs} # 计算未归一化的后验之比
log_post_unnormalized_current = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k, self.current_a, self.current_b,
self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
log_post_unnormalized_new = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k_new, new_a, new_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
# 计算接受率
log_acceptance_ratio = log_post_unnormalized_new - log_post_unnormalized_current + log_ratio
acceptance_ratio = np.exp(log_acceptance_ratio)
return {"k_new": k_new, "a_new": new_a, "b_new": new_b, "log_ratio": log_ratio, "type": "birth_real", "new_eigs": new_eigs, "acceptance_ratio": acceptance_ratio}
else: else:
# --- 诞生一对复共轭根 (k -> k+2) --- # --- 诞生一对复共轭根 (k -> k+2) ---
k_new = k + 2 k_new = k + 2
# 诞生实根的对数概率之比
log_birth_complex_forward = np.log(0.5)
log_birth_complex_backward = np.log(0.5)
# 采样辅助变量 u = (rho, theta, u_b1, u_b2) # 采样辅助变量 u = (rho, theta, u_b1, u_b2)
rho = np.sqrt(np.random.uniform(0, 1.0)) rho = np.sqrt(np.random.uniform(0, 1.0))
theta = np.random.uniform(0, np.pi) theta = np.random.uniform(0, np.pi)
@@ -286,25 +324,31 @@ class RJMCMC_Sampler:
u_b1, u_b2 = np.random.normal(0, 1, 2) u_b1, u_b2 = np.random.normal(0, 1, 2)
# 计算对数提议密度 log(q(u)) # 计算对数提议密度 log(q(u))
log_q_forward = -np.log(np.pi) + stats.norm.logpdf(u_b1, 0, 1) + stats.norm.logpdf(u_b2, 0, 1) log_q_forward = log_birth_complex_forward + stats.norm.logpdf(u_b1, 0, 1) + stats.norm.logpdf(u_b2, 0, 1) - np.log(np.pi) - np.log(1.0)
log_q_backward = log_birth_complex_backward - np.log(num_complex_eigs + 1)
# 计算对数雅可比行列式 log|J| # 计算对数雅可比行列式 log|J|
# |J| = |product(|u_lambda - lambda_i|^2) * (2*Im(u_lambda))| # |J| = 2*ρ
if k == 0: log_jacobian = np.log(2 * rho)
log_jacobian = np.log(np.abs(2 * u_lambda.imag))
else:
log_jacobian = np.sum(np.log(np.abs(u_lambda - current_eigs)**2)) + \
np.log(np.abs(2 * u_lambda.imag))
# 构造新状态 # 构造新状态
new_eigs = np.append(current_eigs, [u_lambda, np.conjugate(u_lambda)]) new_eigs = np.append(current_eigs, [u_lambda, np.conjugate(u_lambda)])
new_a = np.real(np.poly(new_eigs)[1:][::-1]) new_a = np.real(np.poly(new_eigs)[1:][::-1])
new_b = np.append(self.current_b, [u_b1, u_b2]) new_b = np.append(self.current_b, [u_b1, u_b2])
log_ratio = log_jacobian - log_q_forward log_ratio = log_q_backward + log_jacobian - log_q_forward
# 计算未归一化的后验之比
log_post_unnormalized_current = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k, self.current_a, self.current_b,
self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
log_post_unnormalized_new = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k_new, new_a, new_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
# 计算接受率
log_acceptance_ratio = log_post_unnormalized_new - log_post_unnormalized_current + log_ratio
acceptance_ratio = np.exp(log_acceptance_ratio)
return {"k_new": k_new, "a_new": new_a, "b_new": new_b, "log_ratio": log_ratio, "type": "birth_complex", "new_eigs": new_eigs, "acceptance_ratio": acceptance_ratio}
return {"k_new": k_new, "a_new": new_a, "b_new": new_b, "log_ratio": log_ratio, "type": "birth_real", "new_eigs": new_eigs}
def _propose_death(self): def _propose_death(self):
""" """
提议一个 "消亡" 转移 (k -> k-1 或 k -> k-2)。 提议一个 "消亡" 转移 (k -> k-1 或 k -> k-2)。
@@ -317,8 +361,8 @@ class RJMCMC_Sampler:
real_eigs_indices = np.where(np.isreal(current_eigs)) real_eigs_indices = np.where(np.isreal(current_eigs))
complex_eigs_indices = np.where((np.iscomplex(current_eigs)) & (current_eigs.imag > 0)) #type: ignore complex_eigs_indices = np.where((np.iscomplex(current_eigs)) & (current_eigs.imag > 0)) #type: ignore
can_remove_real = len(real_eigs_indices) > 0 can_remove_real = len(real_eigs_indices[0]) > 0
can_remove_complex = len(complex_eigs_indices) > 0 can_remove_complex = len(complex_eigs_indices[0]) > 0
if not can_remove_real and not can_remove_complex: if not can_remove_real and not can_remove_complex:
return None # 无法执行消亡 return None # 无法执行消亡
@@ -335,66 +379,129 @@ class RJMCMC_Sampler:
# --- 消亡一个实数根 (k -> k-1) --- # --- 消亡一个实数根 (k -> k-1) ---
k_new = k - 1 k_new = k - 1
# 生成与消亡实根对应的诞生过程的对数概率之比
log_death_real_forward = np.log(0.5)
log_death_real_backward = np.log(0.5)
# 1. 随机选择一个实数根移除 # 1. 随机选择一个实数根移除
idx_to_remove = np.random.choice(real_eigs_indices) idx_to_remove = np.random.choice(real_eigs_indices[0])
lambda_removed = current_eigs[idx_to_remove] lambda_removed = current_eigs[idx_to_remove]
# 2. 随机选择一个实数 b 系数移除
idx_b_to_remove = np.random.choice(len(self.current_b))
b_removed = self.current_b[idx_b_to_remove]
# 移除的根和b系数构成了逆向(诞生)提议的辅助变量 u # 移除的根和b系数构成了逆向(诞生)提议的辅助变量 u
u_lambda = lambda_removed u_lambda = lambda_removed
u_b = self.current_b[-1] u_b = b_removed
# 2. 计算逆向提议的对数密度 log(q(u)) # 2. 计算逆向提议的对数密度 log(q(u))
log_q_reverse = -np.log(2.0) + stats.norm.logpdf(u_b, 0, 1) log_q_forward = log_death_real_forward - np.log(len(real_eigs_indices[0])) - np.log(len(self.current_b))
log_q_backward = log_death_real_backward + stats.norm.logpdf(u_b, 0, 1) - np.log(2.0)
# 3. 计算对应诞生过程的对数雅可比行列式 log|J| # 3. 计算对应诞生过程的对数雅可比行列式 log|J|
remaining_eigs = np.delete(current_eigs, idx_to_remove) remaining_eigs = np.delete(current_eigs, idx_to_remove)
if k_new == 0: if k_new == 0:
log_jacobian_birth = 0.0 log_jacobian_birth = 0.0
else: else:
log_jacobian_birth = np.sum(np.log(np.abs(u_lambda - remaining_eigs))) log_jacobian_birth = 1
# 构造新状态 # 构造新状态
new_a = np.real(np.poly(remaining_eigs)[1:][::-1]) if k_new == 0:
new_b = self.current_b[:-1] new_a = np.array([])
else:
new_a = np.real(np.poly(remaining_eigs)[1:][::-1])
new_b = np.delete(self.current_b, idx_b_to_remove)
# 接受率中的项为 q_reverse(u) / |J_birth|,在对数空间中为 log(q_reverse) - log|J_birth| # 接受率中的项为 q_backward(u) / (|J| * q_forward(u))
log_ratio = log_q_reverse - log_jacobian_birth log_ratio = -log_q_forward - log_jacobian_birth + log_q_backward
# 计算未归一化的后验之比
log_post_unnormalized_current = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k, current_eigs, self.current_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
log_post_unnormalized_new = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k_new, remaining_eigs, new_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
# 计算接受率
log_acceptance_ratio = log_post_unnormalized_new - log_post_unnormalized_current + log_ratio
acceptance_ratio = np.exp(log_acceptance_ratio)
return {"k_new": k_new, "a_new": new_a, "b_new": new_b, "log_ratio": log_ratio, "type": "death_real", "new_eigs": remaining_eigs, "acceptance_ratio": acceptance_ratio}
return {"k_new": k_new, "a_new": new_a, "b_new": new_b, "log_ratio": log_ratio, "type": "death_real", "new_eigs": remaining_eigs}
else: else:
# --- 消亡一对复共轭根 (k -> k-2) --- # --- 消亡一对复共轭根 (k -> k-2) ---
k_new = k - 2 k_new = k - 2
rho = np.sqrt(np.random.uniform(0, 1.0))
# 生成与消亡复共轭对对应的诞生过程的对数概率之比
log_death_complex_forward = np.log(0.5)
log_death_complex_backward = np.log(0.5)
# 随机选择一对共轭根移除 # 随机选择一对共轭根移除
complex_idx_to_remove = np.random.choice(complex_eigs_indices) complex_idx_to_remove = np.random.choice(complex_eigs_indices[0])
lambda_removed = current_eigs[complex_idx_to_remove] lambda_removed = current_eigs[complex_idx_to_remove]
# 随机选择一对 b 系数移除,需要确保两次选的不一样
idx_b1_to_remove, idx_b2_to_remove = np.random.choice(len(self.current_b), size=2, replace=False)
b1_removed = self.current_b[idx_b1_to_remove]
b2_removed = self.current_b[idx_b2_to_remove]
# 找到其共轭对 # 找到其共轭对
conjugate_idx_to_remove = np.where(current_eigs == np.conjugate(lambda_removed)) conjugate_idx_to_remove_array = np.where(current_eigs == np.conjugate(lambda_removed))[0]
if len(conjugate_idx_to_remove_array) == 0:
return None # 找不到共轭对,无法执行消亡
conjugate_idx = conjugate_idx_to_remove_array[0]
# 逆向提议的辅助变量 u # 逆向提议的辅助变量 u
u_lambda = lambda_removed u_lambda = lambda_removed
u_b1, u_b2 = self.current_b[-2:] u_b1, u_b2 = self.current_b[-2:]
# 计算逆向提议的对数密度 log(q(u)) # 计算逆向提议的对数密度 log(q(u))
log_q_reverse = -np.log(np.pi) + stats.norm.logpdf(u_b1, 0, 1) + stats.norm.logpdf(u_b2, 0, 1) n_b = len(self.current_b)
pair_count = n_b * (n_b - 1) / 2.0
log_q_forward = log_death_complex_forward - np.log(len(complex_eigs_indices[0])) - np.log(pair_count)
log_q_backward = log_death_complex_backward + stats.norm.logpdf(u_b1, 0, 1) + stats.norm.logpdf(u_b2, 0, 1) - np.log(np.pi) - np.log(1.0)
# 计算对应诞生过程的对数雅可比行列式 # 计算对应诞生过程的对数雅可比行列式
remaining_eigs = np.delete(current_eigs, [complex_idx_to_remove, conjugate_idx_to_remove]) remaining_eigs = np.delete(current_eigs, [complex_idx_to_remove, conjugate_idx])
if k_new == 0: log_jacobian = np.log(2 * rho)
log_jacobian_birth = np.log(np.abs(2 * u_lambda.imag)) #type: ignore
else:
log_jacobian_birth = np.sum(np.log(np.abs(u_lambda - remaining_eigs)**2)) + \
np.log(np.abs(2 * u_lambda.imag)) #type: ignore
# 构造新状态 # 构造新状态
new_a = np.real(np.poly(remaining_eigs)[1:][::-1]) if k_new == 0:
new_b = self.current_b[:-2] new_a = np.array([])
else:
new_a = np.real(np.poly(remaining_eigs)[1:][::-1])
new_b = np.delete(self.current_b, [idx_b1_to_remove, idx_b2_to_remove])
log_ratio = log_q_reverse - log_jacobian_birth log_ratio = -log_q_forward - log_jacobian + log_q_backward
return {"k_new": k_new, "a_new": new_a, "b_new": new_b, "log_ratio": log_ratio, "type": "death_complex", "new_eigs": remaining_eigs} # 计算未归一化的后验之比
log_post_unnormalized_current = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k, current_eigs, self.current_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
log_post_unnormalized_new = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k_new, remaining_eigs, new_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
# 计算接受率
log_acceptance_ratio = log_post_unnormalized_new - log_post_unnormalized_current + log_ratio
acceptance_ratio = np.exp(log_acceptance_ratio)
return {"k_new": k_new, "a_new": new_a, "b_new": new_b, "log_ratio": log_ratio, "type": "death_complex", "new_eigs": remaining_eigs, "acceptance_ratio": acceptance_ratio}
def _propose_within_model(self):
"""
随机选择实根变复根,复根变实根,或微调现有根,调用现有函数_merge_eigenvalues_split_eigenvalues_disturbe_swimming。
"""
k = self.current_k
current_eigs = self.current_eigenvalues.copy()
if k == 0:
return None # 无法在 k=0 时进行模型内提议
proposal_type = np.random.choice(['merge', 'split', 'disturb'], p=[0.3, 0.3, 0.4])
if proposal_type == 'merge':
return self._merge_eigenvalues(current_eigs) # type: ignore
elif proposal_type == 'split':
return self._split_eigenvalues(current_eigs) # type: ignore
else:
return self._disturbe_swimming(current_eigs) # type: ignore
def _log_prior_b(self, b_coeffs): def _log_prior_b(self, b_coeffs):
""" """
@@ -404,6 +511,7 @@ class RJMCMC_Sampler:
""" """
# #
return stats.norm.logpdf(b_coeffs, 0, 1).sum() return stats.norm.logpdf(b_coeffs, 0, 1).sum()
def _generate_stable_a(self, k): def _generate_stable_a(self, k):
""" """
@@ -513,136 +621,344 @@ class RJMCMC_Sampler:
return A_c, B_c, C_c, D_c return A_c, B_c, C_c, D_c
def _log_prior_full(self, k, a_coeffs, b_coeffs, sigma2_w, sigma2_z): def _log_posterior_unnormalized(self, k, eigenvalues, b_coeffs, sigma2_w, sigma2_z):
"""计算所有参数的完整对数验。""" """计算所有参数的非归一化对数验。"""
log_prior_k = -np.log(self.k_max - self.k_min + 1)
if k > 0:
poly_coeffs = np.concatenate(([1], -a_coeffs[::-1]))
eigenvalues = np.roots(poly_coeffs)
log_prior_a = self._log_prior_eigenvalues_to_a(eigenvalues)
else:
log_prior_a = 0.0
log_prior_b = self._log_prior_b(b_coeffs)
precision_w = 1.0 / sigma2_w
precision_z = 1.0 / sigma2_z
log_prior_w = stats.gamma.logpdf(precision_w, a=self.lambda_a_w, scale=1.0/self.lambda_b_w)
log_prior_z = stats.gamma.logpdf(precision_z, a=self.lambda_a_z, scale=1.0/self.lambda_b_z)
return log_prior_k + log_prior_a + log_prior_b + log_prior_w + log_prior_z
def _log_posterior(self, k, b_coeffs, sigma2_w, sigma2_z, a_coeffs=None, eigenvalues=None):
"""计算给定参数下的完整对数后验概率。"""
# 1. 计算先验
log_prior_k = -np.log(self.k_max - self.k_min + 1) log_prior_k = -np.log(self.k_max - self.k_min + 1)
if eigenvalues is not None:
log_prior_a = self._log_prior_eigenvalues_to_a(eigenvalues) if k > 0:
a_coeffs = self._cal_current_a_coeffs(eigenvalues) log_prior_eigen = self._log_prior_eigenvalues(eigenvalues)
elif a_coeffs is not None:
if k > 0:
eigenvalues = self._cal_current_eigenvalues(a_coeffs)
log_prior_a = self._log_prior_eigenvalues_to_a(eigenvalues)
else:
log_prior_a = 0.0
else: else:
raise ValueError("Either a_coeffs or eigenvalues must be provided.") log_prior_eigen = 0.0
if log_prior_a == -np.inf: return -np.inf
log_prior_b = self._log_prior_b(b_coeffs) log_prior_b = self._log_prior_b(b_coeffs)
precision_w = 1.0 / sigma2_w precision_w = 1.0 / sigma2_w
precision_z = 1.0 / sigma2_z precision_z = 1.0 / sigma2_z
log_prior_w = stats.gamma.logpdf(precision_w, a=self.lambda_a_w, scale=1.0/self.lambda_b_w) log_prior_w = stats.gamma.logpdf(precision_w, a=self.lambda_a_w, scale=1.0/self.lambda_b_w)
log_prior_z = stats.gamma.logpdf(precision_z, a=self.lambda_a_z, scale=1.0/self.lambda_b_z) log_prior_z = stats.gamma.logpdf(precision_z, a=self.lambda_a_z, scale=1.0/self.lambda_b_z)
log_prior = log_prior_k + log_prior_a + log_prior_b + log_prior_w + log_prior_z log_likelihood = self._log_likelihood(k, self._cal_current_a_coeffs(eigenvalues), b_coeffs, sigma2_w, sigma2_z)
return log_prior_k + log_prior_eigen + log_prior_b + log_prior_w + log_prior_z + log_likelihood
# 2. 计算似然
log_likelihood = self._log_likelihood(k, a_coeffs, b_coeffs, sigma2_w, sigma2_z)
return log_prior + log_likelihood
def _purpose_b_swimming(self):
"""
对 b 系数进行游动:对每个 b_i 添加一个小的高斯扰动, 返回b游动前后的先验
"""
k = self.current_k
current_b = self.current_b
proposal_b = np.copy(current_b)
# 对每个 b_i 添加高斯扰动
for i in range(k):
b_proposal = proposal_b[i] + np.random.normal(0, 0.1) # 小的高斯扰动
proposal_b[i] = b_proposal
# 计算新b的先验
log_prior_current = self._log_prior_b(current_b)
log_prior_proposal = self._log_prior_b(proposal_b)
return proposal_b, log_prior_current, log_prior_proposal
def _purpose_lumbda_swimming(self):
"""
对 lumbda 进行游动:对每个 lumbda 添加一个小的高斯扰动,虚部也要有扰动
"""
k = self.current_k
current_eigs = np.copy(self.current_eigenvalues)
proposal_eigs = np.copy(current_eigs)
# 对每个 lumbda 添加高斯扰动
for i in range(k):
eig_proposal = proposal_eigs[i] + np.random.normal(0, 0.1) # 小的高斯扰动
proposal_eigs[i] = eig_proposal
# 虚部也要有扰动,共轭的虚部记得相等
for i in range(k):
if np.iscomplex(proposal_eigs[i]) and proposal_eigs[i].imag != 0:
imag_perturbation = np.random.normal(0, 0.1)
proposal_eigs[i] = proposal_eigs[i].real + 1j * (proposal_eigs[i].imag + imag_perturbation)
# 找到共轭根并更新
conjugate_idx = np.where(proposal_eigs == np.conjugate(current_eigs[i]))[0]
if len(conjugate_idx) > 0:
proposal_eigs[conjugate_idx[0]] = proposal_eigs[conjugate_idx[0]].real - 1j * (current_eigs[i].imag + imag_perturbation)
# 计算新lumbda的先验
log_prior_current = self._log_prior_eigenvalues(current_eigs)
log_prior_proposal = self._log_prior_eigenvalues(proposal_eigs)
return proposal_eigs, log_prior_current, log_prior_proposal
def _merge_eigenvalues(self):
def _merge_eigenvalues(self, current_eigs):
"""合并游动:选择两个实数根,确定性地合并为一个复共轭对。""" """合并游动:选择两个实数根,确定性地合并为一个复共轭对。"""
k = self.current_k k = self.current_k
current_eigs = np.copy(self.current_eigenvalues)
# 随机选择两个不同的实数根 # 随机选择两个不同的实数根(可能是虚部为0的复数),并删除他们
real_indices = np.where(np.isclose(current_eigs.imag, 0)) real_indices = np.where(np.isreal(current_eigs))
idx1, idx2 = np.random.choice(real_indices, 2, replace=False) if len(real_indices[0]) < 2:
lambda1, lambda2 = current_eigs[idx1].real, current_eigs[idx2].real return # 不足两个实数根,无法合并
idx_pair = np.random.choice(real_indices[0], size=2, replace=False)
idx1, idx2 = idx_pair
lambda1 = current_eigs[idx1].real # type: ignore
lambda2 = current_eigs[idx2].real # type: ignore
# 确定性映射 -> 新的复共轭对 current_eigs = np.delete(current_eigs, [idx1, idx2])
a = (lambda1 + lambda2) / 2.0
b = abs(lambda2 - lambda1) / 2.0
new_complex_pair = [a + 1j*b, a - 1j*b]
# 构造提议的特征值集合 # 生成一对共轭复根
proposal_eigs = np.delete(current_eigs, [idx1, idx2]) new_theta = np.random.uniform(0, np.pi)
proposal_eigs = np.append(proposal_eigs, new_complex_pair) new_rho = np.random.uniform(0, 1.0)
new_eigenvalue = new_rho * (np.cos(new_theta) + 1j * np.sin(new_theta))
current_eigs = np.append(current_eigs, [new_eigenvalue, np.conjugate(new_eigenvalue)])
# 检查稳定性 # 对b进行游动
if np.any(np.abs(proposal_eigs) >= 1.0): return proposal_b, log_prior_b_current, log_prior_b_proposal = self._purpose_b_swimming()
# 计算提议密度
# 正向过程是任选两个实根,合并为复共轭对
log_q_merge_forward = -np.log(len(real_indices[0]) * (len(real_indices[0]) - 1) / 2.0) - np.log(np.pi) - np.log(1.0) # 提议密度 q_forward(u) 在 (0, pi) x (0,1)
# 逆向过程是从复共轭对中任选一个删去,然后抽样两个新实根,提议分布就是均匀分布
num_complex_eigs = len(np.where((np.iscomplex(current_eigs)) & (current_eigs.imag > 0))[0]) #type: ignore
log_q_merge_backward = -np.log(num_complex_eigs + 1) - np.log(2) - np.log(2)
# 计算对数提议比
log_proposal_ratio = log_q_merge_backward - log_q_merge_forward
# 计算后验比
log_post_unnormalized_current = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k, self.current_eigenvalues, self.current_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
log_post_unnormalized_proposal = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k, current_eigs, proposal_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
# 计算接受率 # 计算接受率
# a. 计算后验比 log_acceptance_ratio = (log_post_unnormalized_proposal - log_post_unnormalized_current) + log_proposal_ratio
log_post_current = self._log_posterior(k, self.current_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z, self.current_a, eigenvalues=current_eigs)
a_proposal = np.real(np.poly(proposal_eigs)[1:][::-1])
log_post_proposal = self._log_posterior(k, self.current_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z, a_proposal, eigenvalues=proposal_eigs)
# b. 计算提议比和雅可比项 acceptance_ratio = np.exp(log_acceptance_ratio)
# 正向 (merge): 确定性,q_forward = 1
# 逆向 (split): 需要一个辅助变量 u,我们设计 u ~ Beta(2, 2) 在 (0, 1) 上
# 对应的雅可比行列式 |J| = 2b
# 完整的对数项为 log(q_reverse / q_forward * 1/|J|) = log(q_reverse) - log|J|
log_proposal_ratio = stats.uniform.logpdf(0.5, -1, 1) - np.log(2*b) # u=0.5 in reverse
log_acceptance_ratio = (log_post_proposal - log_post_current) + log_proposal_ratio return {"a_new": np.real(np.poly(current_eigs)[1:][::-1]), "b_new": proposal_b, "log_ratio": log_proposal_ratio, "type": "merge", "new_eigs": current_eigs, "acceptance_ratio": acceptance_ratio}
# 接受或拒绝 def _split_eigenvalues(self, current_eigs):
if np.log(np.random.rand()) < log_acceptance_ratio: """
self.current_a = a_proposal 分裂游动:选择一个复共轭对,随机地分裂为两个实数根。
self.current_eigenvalues = proposal_eigs """
def _split_eigenvalues(self):
"""分裂游动:选择一个复共轭对,随机地分裂为两个实数根。"""
k = self.current_k k = self.current_k
current_eigs = np.copy(self.current_eigenvalues)
# 随机选择一个复共轭对 # 随机选择一个复共轭对,并删除它们
complex_indices = np.where((~np.isclose(current_eigs.imag, 0)) & (current_eigs.imag > 0)) complex_indices = np.where((np.iscomplex(current_eigs)) & (current_eigs.imag > 0)) #type: ignore
idx_c = np.random.choice(complex_indices) if len(complex_indices[0]) < 1:
lambda_c = current_eigs[idx_c] return # 没有复共轭对,无法分裂
a, b = lambda_c.real, lambda_c.imag idx_to_remove = np.random.choice(complex_indices[0])
lambda_removed = current_eigs[idx_to_remove]
conjugate_idx_to_remove = np.where(current_eigs == np.conjugate(lambda_removed))[0]
if len(conjugate_idx_to_remove) == 0:
return # 找不到共轭对,无法分裂
conjugate_idx = conjugate_idx_to_remove[0]
# 映射到两个实数根 # 删除选中的复共轭对
u = np.random.beta(2, 2) current_eigs = np.delete(current_eigs, [idx_to_remove, conjugate_idx])
lambda1 = a + b * u # 生成两个实数根
lambda2 = a - b * u real_eig1 = np.random.uniform(-1.0, 1.0)
new_real_pair = [lambda1, lambda2] real_eig2 = np.random.uniform(-1.0, 1.0)
current_eigs = np.append(current_eigs, [real_eig1, real_eig2])
# 构造提议的特征值集合 # 对b进行游动
idx_c_conj = np.where(np.isclose(current_eigs, np.conjugate(lambda_c))) proposal_b, log_prior_b_current, log_prior_b_proposal = self._purpose_b_swimming()
proposal_eigs = np.delete(current_eigs, [idx_c, idx_c_conj])
proposal_eigs = np.append(proposal_eigs, new_real_pair)
# 检查稳定性 # 计算提议密度
if np.any(np.abs(proposal_eigs) >= 1.0): return # 正向过程是任选一个复共轭对,分裂为两个实根
log_q_split_forward = -np.log(len(complex_indices[0])) - np.log(2) - np.log(2) # 提议密度 q_forward(u) 在 (-1,1) x (-1,1)
# 逆向过程是从实根中任选两个删去,然后抽样一个复共轭对,提议分布就是均匀分布
num_real_eigs = len(np.where(np.isreal(current_eigs))[0])
log_q_split_backward = -np.log(num_real_eigs * (num_real_eigs - 1) / 2.0) - np.log(np.pi) - np.log(1.0)
# 计算对数提议比
log_proposal_ratio = log_q_split_backward - log_q_split_forward
# 计算后验比
log_post_unnormalized_current = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k, self.current_eigenvalues, self.current_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
log_post_unnormalized_proposal = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k, current_eigs, proposal_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
# 计算接受率 # 计算接受率
# a. 计算后验比 log_acceptance_ratio = (log_post_unnormalized_proposal - log_post_unnormalized_current) + log_proposal_ratio
log_post_current = self._log_posterior(k, self.current_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z, self.current_a, eigenvalues=current_eigs) acceptance_ratio = np.exp(log_acceptance_ratio)
a_proposal = np.real(np.poly(proposal_eigs)[1:][::-1])
log_post_proposal = self._log_posterior(k, self.current_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z, a_proposal, eigenvalues=proposal_eigs) return {"a_new": np.real(np.poly(current_eigs)[1:][::-1]), "b_new": proposal_b, "log_ratio": log_proposal_ratio, "type": "split", "new_eigs": current_eigs, "acceptance_ratio": acceptance_ratio}
def _disturbe_swimming(self, current_eigs):
"""
扰动游动:保持维度不变,保持实数根和复共轭对的数量不变,进行扰动。
"""
k = self.current_k
# 对特征值进行游动
proposal_eigs, log_prior_eigs_current, log_prior_eigs_proposal = self._purpose_lumbda_swimming()
# 对b进行游动
proposal_b, log_prior_b_current, log_prior_b_proposal = self._purpose_b_swimming()
# 计算提议密度比 (对称提议,密度相等)
log_proposal_ratio = 0.0
# 计算后验比
log_post_unnormalized_current = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k, self.current_eigenvalues, self.current_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
log_post_unnormalized_proposal = self._log_posterior_unnormalized(k, proposal_eigs, proposal_b, self.current_sigma2_w, self.current_sigma2_z)
# 计算接受率
log_acceptance_ratio = (log_post_unnormalized_proposal - log_post_unnormalized_current) + log_proposal_ratio
acceptance_ratio = np.exp(log_acceptance_ratio)
return {"a_new": np.real(np.poly(proposal_eigs)[1:][::-1]), "b_new": proposal_b, "log_ratio": log_proposal_ratio, "type": "disturbe", "new_eigs": proposal_eigs, "acceptance_ratio": acceptance_ratio}
def run_MCMC(self, num_iterations):
"""
运行 RJMCMC 采样器指定次数的迭代。
"""
# 存储采样历史
k_history = []
a_history = []
b_history = []
sigma2_w_history = []
sigma2_z_history = []
eigenvalues_history = []
print(f"Starting MCMC with initial k={self.current_k}")
for i in range(num_iterations):
# 随机选择一种转移类型
# 这里的概率可以根据需要调整
move_type = np.random.choice(['birth_death', 'within_model'], p=[0.5, 0.5])
proposal = None
accepted = False
move_name = 'None'
if move_type == 'birth_death':
# 决定是 birth 还是 death
if self.current_k == self.k_min:
proposal = self._propose_birth()
elif self.current_k == self.k_max:
proposal = self._propose_death()
else:
if np.random.rand() < 0.5:
proposal = self._propose_birth()
else:
proposal = self._propose_death()
elif move_type == 'within_model':
proposal = self._propose_within_model()
# 处理提议
if proposal and 'acceptance_ratio' in proposal:
move_name = proposal.get('type', 'N/A')
if np.random.rand() < proposal['acceptance_ratio']:
# 接受提议,更新状态
if 'k_new' in proposal: self.current_k = proposal['k_new']
if 'new_eigs' in proposal: self.current_eigenvalues = proposal['new_eigs']
self.current_a = self._cal_current_a_coeffs(self.current_eigenvalues)
if 'b_new' in proposal: self.current_b = proposal['b_new']
# sigma2_w 和 sigma2_z 在这些提议中没有更新,保持不变
accepted = True
# 存储当前状态 (无论是否接受,都存储当前链的状态)
k_history.append(self.current_k)
a_history.append(self.current_a)
b_history.append(self.current_b)
sigma2_w_history.append(self.current_sigma2_w)
sigma2_z_history.append(self.current_sigma2_z)
eigenvalues_history.append(self.current_eigenvalues)
if (i + 1) % 100 == 0:
status = "Accepted" if accepted else "Rejected"
print(f"Iteration {i+1}/{num_iterations}, k: {self.current_k}, Move: {move_name}, Status: {status}")
return {
"k": np.array(k_history),
"a": a_history,
"b": b_history,
"sigma2_w": np.array(sigma2_w_history),
"sigma2_z": np.array(sigma2_z_history),
"eigenvalues": eigenvalues_history
}
if __name__ == "__main__":
# 导入生成数据的模块
from generateSimData import simulate_lti_data
from generateGroudTruth import generate_ground_truth_system
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# 配置 matplotlib 支持中文显示
plt.rcParams['font.sans-serif'] = ['SimHei', 'Microsoft YaHei', 'Arial Unicode MS'] # 用来正常显示中文标签
plt.rcParams['axes.unicode_minus'] = False # 用来正常显示负号
# 1. 生成 Ground Truth 系统和仿真数据
print("--- 1. 生成仿真数据 ---")
# 真实系统阶数为 2
A_true, B_true, C_true, D_true = generate_ground_truth_system(dx=2, rng_seed=42)
T_steps = 400
sigma_proc = 0.1 # 过程噪声标准差
sigma_meas = 0.1 # 测量噪声标准差
u_data, y_data = simulate_lti_data(
A_true, B_true, C_true, D_true,
T=T_steps,
sigma_process=sigma_proc,
sigma_measurement=sigma_meas,
rng_seed=123
)
# RJMCMC_Sampler 需要一维的 y 和 u
y_data_flat = y_data.flatten()
u_data_flat = u_data.flatten()
print(f"仿真数据生成完毕。 y shape: {y_data_flat.shape}, u shape: {u_data_flat.shape}")
# 2. 初始化 RJMCMC 采样器
print("\n--- 2. 初始化 RJMCMC 采样器 ---")
sampler = RJMCMC_Sampler(
y=y_data_flat,
u=u_data_flat,
k_min=1,
k_max=4, # 探索的最大阶数
initial_k=3 # 从一个不等于真实阶数的阶数开始
)
# 3. 运行 MCMC
print("\n--- 3. 开始运行 MCMC 采样 ---")
num_iterations = 20000
results = sampler.run_MCMC(num_iterations)
print("MCMC 采样完成。")
# 4. 分析和可视化结果
print("\n--- 4. 分析结果 ---")
# 丢弃早期样本 (burn-in)
burn_in = 1000
k_samples = results['k'][burn_in:]
# 计算模型阶数的后验分布
# 使用 bincount 统计每个 k 出现的次数
k_posterior_counts = np.bincount(k_samples, minlength=sampler.k_max + 1)
k_posterior_prob = k_posterior_counts / len(k_samples)
# 打印后验概率
print("模型阶数的后验概率分布:")
for k_val in range(sampler.k_min, sampler.k_max + 1):
print(f" P(k={k_val} | y) ≈ {k_posterior_prob[k_val]:.4f}")
# 可视化 k 的后验分布
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
plt.bar(range(sampler.k_min, sampler.k_max + 1),
k_posterior_prob[sampler.k_min:sampler.k_max + 1],
color='skyblue', alpha=0.8, label='Posterior Probability')
plt.axvline(x=2, color='red', linestyle='--', label='True Model Order (k=2)')
plt.xlabel("模型阶数 (k)")
plt.ylabel("后验概率 P(k|y)")
plt.title("模型阶数的后验分布 (After Burn-in)")
plt.xticks(range(sampler.k_min, sampler.k_max + 1))
plt.legend()
plt.grid(axis='y', linestyle='--', alpha=0.7)
plt.show()
# b. 计算提议比和雅可比项
# 正向 (split): 随机,q_forward = p(u)
# 逆向 (merge): 确定性,q_reverse = 1
# 雅可比行列式 |J| = 2b
# 完整的对数项为 log(q_reverse / q_forward * |J|) = -log(q_forward) + log|J|
log_proposal_ratio = -stats.beta.logpdf(u, 2, 2) + np.log(2*b)
BIN
View File
Binary file not shown.
+225 -19
View File
@@ -31,25 +31,65 @@ def generate_ground_truth_system(dx=2, du=1, dy=1, rng_seed=None):
# --- 1. 生成稳定的 A 矩阵 (dx x dx) --- # --- 1. 生成稳定的 A 矩阵 (dx x dx) ---
# 论文图 2(b) 显示了复特征值,遵循 6.2 节的极坐标法 # 论文图 2(b) 显示了复特征值,遵循 6.2 节的极坐标法
# 在极坐标下采样一对共轭复特征值 all_eigenvalues = []
r_squared = rng.uniform(0, 1.0) # 采样 r^2,确保在单位圆内
r = np.sqrt(r_squared)
theta = rng.uniform(0, np.pi) # 仅在上半平面采样角度
lambda1 = r * (np.cos(theta) + 1j * np.sin(theta)) # 确保至少一个实特征值,如果 dx 为奇数
lambda2 = np.conjugate(lambda1) num_real_needed = dx % 2
for _ in range(num_real_needed):
all_eigenvalues.append(rng.uniform(-0.99, 0.99)) # 稳定的实数特征值
# 生成复共轭特征值对
num_complex_pairs_needed = (dx - num_real_needed) // 2
for _ in range(num_complex_pairs_needed):
r_squared = rng.uniform(0, 1.0)
r = np.sqrt(r_squared) * rng.uniform(0.1, 0.99) # 确保半径在稳定范围内
theta = rng.uniform(0, np.pi) # 仅在上半平面采样角度
lambda1 = r * (np.cos(theta) + 1j * np.sin(theta))
all_eigenvalues.append(lambda1)
all_eigenvalues.append(np.conjugate(lambda1))
# 创建对应的实数块对角矩阵 rng.shuffle(all_eigenvalues) # 随机打乱特征值顺序
alpha, beta = lambda1.real, lambda1.imag
lambda_block = np.array([[alpha, beta], # 构造一个 Real Schur Form 的块对角矩阵 (J_block)
[-beta, alpha]]) J_blocks = []
current_eigenvalues = list(all_eigenvalues) # 创建一个可变副本
# 生成一个随机正交矩阵 V (dx x dx) [cite: 511, 584] while current_eigenvalues:
e = current_eigenvalues.pop(0)
if np.isreal(e):
J_blocks.append(np.array([[e.real]]))
else:
# 寻找其共轭
conjugate_found = False
for i, ce in enumerate(current_eigenvalues):
if np.isclose(ce, np.conjugate(e)): # 使用 np.isclose 进行浮点比较
alpha = e.real
beta = e.imag
J_blocks.append(np.array([[alpha, beta], [-beta, alpha]]))
current_eigenvalues.pop(i) # 移除已使用的共轭特征值
conjugate_found = True
break
if not conjugate_found:
# 如果没有找到共轭(理论上不应发生,但作为健壮性处理),退化为实部
J_blocks.append(np.array([[e.real]]))
# 组装 J_block
if not J_blocks: # 处理 dx=0 或空列表的情况
J_block = np.zeros((0,0))
else:
# 使用 np.block 构造块对角矩阵
J_block = np.block([
[J_blocks[i] if i == j else np.zeros((J_blocks[i].shape[0], J_blocks[j].shape[1]))
for j in range(len(J_blocks))]
for i in range(len(J_blocks))
])
# 生成一个随机正交矩阵 V (dx x dx)
Z = rng.standard_normal(size=(dx, dx)) Z = rng.standard_normal(size=(dx, dx))
V, _ = np.linalg.qr(Z) V, _ = np.linalg.qr(Z)
# 组装 A = V * Lambda_block * V^T # 组装 A = V * J_block * V^T
A = V @ lambda_block @ V.T A = V @ J_block @ V.T
# --- 2. 生成 B (dx x du) 和 C (dy x dx) 矩阵 --- # --- 2. 生成 B (dx x du) 和 C (dy x dx) 矩阵 ---
# 元素从 N(0, 1) 独立采样 # 元素从 N(0, 1) 独立采样
@@ -77,12 +117,14 @@ def generate_ground_truth_system(dx=2, du=1, dy=1, rng_seed=None):
D = np.zeros((dy, du)) D = np.zeros((dy, du))
print(f"--- 成功生成 Ground Truth 系统 (尝试次数: {attempt + 1}) ---") print(f"--- 成功生成 Ground Truth 系统 (尝试次数: {attempt + 1}) ---")
print(f"特征值: {lambda1:.4f}, {lambda2:.4f}")
# 打印部分特征值,保持输出简洁
print_eigs = [f"{e:.4f}" for e in all_eigenvalues[:min(dx, 4)]]
if dx > 4:
print_eigs.append("...")
print(f"特征值: {', '.join(print_eigs)}")
print(f"Gramian 能量占比: Wc={cond_c:.4f}, Wo={cond_o:.4f}") print(f"Gramian 能量占比: Wc={cond_c:.4f}, Wo={cond_o:.4f}")
print("A = \n", A)
print("B = \n", B)
print("C = \n", C)
print("D = \n", D)
return A, B, C, D return A, B, C, D
@@ -94,7 +136,171 @@ def generate_ground_truth_system(dx=2, du=1, dy=1, rng_seed=None):
# 如果循环结束仍未成功 # 如果循环结束仍未成功
raise RuntimeError(f"{max_retries} 次尝试后未能生成一个良态的系统。") raise RuntimeError(f"{max_retries} 次尝试后未能生成一个良态的系统。")
def transform_to_canonical_form(A, B, C, D):
"""
将给定的 LTI 系统转换为可控规范形 (controllable canonical form)。
此实现特指论文 Definition 3.1 中的 SISO 控制器规范形,并确保马尔可夫参数不变。
参数:
A (np.ndarray): 状态矩阵 (dx x dx)
B (np.ndarray): 输入矩阵 (dx x du)
C (np.ndarray): 输出矩阵 (dy x dx)
D (np.ndarray): 直通矩阵 (dy x du)
返回:
tuple: 转换后的 (A_canon, B_canon, C_canon, D_canon)
抛出:
ValueError: 如果系统不是 SISO 或不可控。
"""
dx = A.shape[0] # 状态维度
du = B.shape[1] # 输入维度
dy = C.shape[0] # 输出维度
# 1. 验证 SISO 系统,因为论文中描述的控制器规范形是针对 SISO 的
if du != 1 or dy != 1:
raise ValueError("此转换仅针对单输入单输出 (SISO) 系统实现。")
# 2. D 矩阵在状态空间变换中是不变的
D_canon = D
# 3. 计算 A 的特征多项式系数
# np.poly(A) 返回 [1, p_{dx-1}, p_{dx-2}, ..., p_0]
# 其中特征多项式为 s^dx + p_{dx-1}s^{dx-1} + ... + p_1 s + p_0
poly_coeffs_with_leading_one = np.poly(A)
# 论文 Definition 3.1 中 A_c 的最后一行是 [-a_0, -a_1, ..., -a_{dx-1}]
# 这里的 a_k 与 np.poly(A) 返回的 p_k 是一致的 (a_k = p_k)。
# 需要将 np.poly(A)[1:] 的系数反序以匹配 A_c 的最后一行结构 [-p_0, -p_1, ..., -p_{dx-1}]
a_coeffs_for_Ac_row = -poly_coeffs_with_leading_one[1:][::-1]
# 4. 构造 A_canon (控制器规范形)
A_canon = np.zeros((dx, dx))
# 填充超对角线为 1
for i in range(dx - 1):
A_canon[i, i+1] = 1
# 填充最后一行
A_canon[dx-1, :] = a_coeffs_for_Ac_row
# 5. 构造 B_canon (控制器规范形)
B_canon = np.zeros((dx, du))
B_canon[-1, 0] = 1 # SISO 情况下,最后一个元素为 1
# 6. 计算原始系统 (A, B) 的可控性矩阵 Q
# Q = [B, A@B, A^2@B, ..., A^(dx-1)@B]
Q = np.zeros((dx, dx))
current_B_col = B
for i in range(dx):
Q[:, i] = current_B_col.flatten() # B 是 dx x 1 向量,需要展平
current_B_col = A @ current_B_col
# 7. 检查可控性
if np.linalg.matrix_rank(Q) != dx:
raise ValueError("系统不可控,无法转换为可控规范形。")
# 8. 计算规范形系统 (A_canon, B_canon) 的可控性矩阵 Q_canon
# Q_canon = [B_canon, A_canon@B_canon, ..., A_canon^(dx-1)@B_canon]
Q_canon = np.zeros((dx, dx))
current_B_c_col = B_canon
for i in range(dx):
Q_canon[:, i] = current_B_c_col.flatten()
current_B_c_col = A_canon @ current_B_c_col
# 9. 计算 C_canon
# 根据控制器规范形的定义,C_canon = [b_0, b_1, ..., b_{dx-1}]
# 其中 b_i 是传递函数分子系数。这可以通过将原始系统的马尔可夫参数 M_k
# 与规范系统的可控性矩阵 Q_canon 关联起来得到。
# 我们知道 [M_1, M_2, ..., M_dx] = C_canon @ Q_canon
# 因此 C_canon = [M_1, M_2, ..., M_dx] @ Q_canon_inv
# 计算原始系统的马尔可夫参数 M_k (k=1...dx)
# M_k = C @ A^(k-1) @ B
markov_params_row_matrix = np.zeros((1, dx))
for k in range(dx):
# markov_params_row_matrix[0, k] 存储的是 M_{k+1},对应 C A^k B
markov_params_row_matrix[0, k] = (C @ np.linalg.matrix_power(A, k) @ B).item()
C_canon = markov_params_row_matrix @ np.linalg.inv(Q_canon)
return A_canon, B_canon, C_canon, D_canon
if __name__ == '__main__': if __name__ == '__main__':
# --- 运行示例 --- # --- 运行示例 ---
# 设置一个随机种子,以便每次运行时都能得到相同的结果 # 设置一个随机种子,以便每次运行时都能得到相同的结果
A_true, B_true, C_true, D_true = generate_ground_truth_system(rng_seed=42) A_true, B_true, C_true, D_true = generate_ground_truth_system(dx=2, du=1, dy=1, rng_seed=42)
print("\n--- 原始系统 ---")
print("A_true = \n", A_true)
print("B_true = \n", B_true)
print("C_true = \n", C_true)
print("D_true = \n", D_true)
# 转换为可控规范形
A_canon, B_canon, C_canon, D_canon = transform_to_canonical_form(A_true, B_true, C_true, D_true)
print("\n--- 可控规范形系统 ---")
print("A_canon = \n", A_canon)
print("B_canon = \n", B_canon)
print("C_canon = \n", C_canon)
print("D_canon = \n", D_canon)
# 验证转换结果 (不变的系统特性)
print("\n--- 验证转换结果 ---")
# 1. D矩阵应相同
print(f"D_true (原始): \n{D_true}")
print(f"D_canon (规范形): \n{D_canon}")
assert np.allclose(D_true, D_canon), "D 矩阵不匹配!"
print("D 矩阵匹配成功!")
# 2. 马尔可夫参数应相同 (输入-输出行为不变)
# M_t = C A^(t-1) B (对于 t >= 1), M_0 = D
def get_markov_params(A, B, C, D, steps=5):
params = [D] # M_0 = D
for t in range(1, steps):
params.append(C @ np.linalg.matrix_power(A, t - 1) @ B)
return params
markov_true = get_markov_params(A_true, B_true, C_true, D_true, steps=5)
markov_canon = get_markov_params(A_canon, B_canon, C_canon, D_canon, steps=5)
print("\n马尔可夫参数验证 (前5步):")
for i in range(len(markov_true)):
print(f" Step {i}: True={markov_true[i].flatten()}, Canon={markov_canon[i].flatten()}")
assert np.allclose(markov_true[i], markov_canon[i]), f"马尔可夫参数在第 {i} 步不匹配!"
print("马尔可夫参数匹配成功!")
# 3. 特征值应相同
eig_true = np.linalg.eigvals(A_true)
eig_canon = np.linalg.eigvals(A_canon)
# 对特征值进行排序以进行比较,因为它们的顺序可能不同
eig_true_sorted = np.sort(eig_true)
eig_canon_sorted = np.sort(eig_canon)
print(f"\n特征值: True={eig_true_sorted}, Canon={eig_canon_sorted}")
assert np.allclose(eig_true_sorted, eig_canon_sorted), "特征值不匹配!"
print("特征值匹配成功!")
print("\n所有验证成功!")
# 尝试一个更高维度的系统
print("\n--- 测试 dx=3 的系统 ---")
A_true_3, B_true_3, C_true_3, D_true_3 = generate_ground_truth_system(dx=3, du=1, dy=1, rng_seed=100)
A_canon_3, B_canon_3, C_canon_3, D_canon_3 = transform_to_canonical_form(A_true_3, B_true_3, C_true_3, D_true_3)
print("\nA_canon (dx=3) = \n", A_canon_3)
print("B_canon (dx=3) = \n", B_canon_3)
print("C_canon (dx=3) = \n", C_canon_3)
markov_true_3 = get_markov_params(A_true_3, B_true_3, C_true_3, D_true_3)
markov_canon_3 = get_markov_params(A_canon_3, B_canon_3, C_canon_3, D_canon_3)
for i in range(len(markov_true_3)):
assert np.allclose(markov_true_3[i], markov_canon_3[i]), f"dx=3 马尔可夫参数在第 {i} 步不匹配!"
print("dx=3 马尔可夫参数匹配成功!")
eig_true_3 = np.linalg.eigvals(A_true_3)
eig_canon_3 = np.linalg.eigvals(A_canon_3)
assert np.allclose(np.sort(eig_true_3), np.sort(eig_canon_3)), "dx=3 特征值不匹配!"
print("dx=3 特征值匹配成功!")
+173
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
好的,让我们从头开始,结合关键公式,详细讲解一下这篇文章。
### 1. 问题的起点:贝叶斯模型更新 (Bayesian Model Updating)
**在科学和工程中,我们经常有一个数学模型 **$G$** 来描述一个物理系统,但模型中包含未知的参数 **$\theta$** **^1^^1^^1^^1^。我们通过实验测量得到一组数据 **$d$** ^2^。**贝叶斯更新** 的目的就是利用这些测量数据 **$d$** 来反推参数 **$\theta$** 的概率分布 ^3^^3^^3^^3^^3^^3^^3^^3^^3^。
这是通过贝叶斯定理实现的,它是本文所有工作的基础:
$$
p_{d}(\theta)=c_{E}^{-1}L(\theta)p_{0}(\theta)
$$
我们来拆解这个公式:
* **$p_{d}(\theta)$:后验概率密度函数 (Posterior PDF)**。这是我们**想要的结果**,即在“看到”测量数据 $d$ 之后,参数 $\theta$ 的概率分布 。
* **$p_{0}(\theta)$:先验概率密度函数 (Prior PDF)**。这是我们**开始的地方**,即在“看到”数据 *之前*,我们对 $\theta$ 的已有认知或假设。
* **$L(\theta)$:似然函数 (Likelihood Function)**。它描述的是:**如果** 参数真的是 $\theta$,那么我们“看到”测量数据 $d$ 的概率有多大 [cite: 102]。
* **$c_{E}$:模型证据 (Model Evidence)**。这是一个归一化常数,它保证 $p_{d}(\theta)$ 的总概率积分为1 [cite: 102]。它的计算公式为:
$$
$$c\_{E}=\\int\_{\\mathbb{R}^{n}}L(\\theta)p\_{0}(\\theta)d\\theta
$$
$c_{E}$ 本身也很有用,它可以用来比较不同模型的好坏 [cite: 37, 105]。
**挑战** **:在参数 **$\theta$** 维度很高(高维问题)时,这个后验分布 **$p_{d}(\theta)$** 非常复杂,几乎不可能直接求解,连 **$c_{E}$** 的积分也算不出来 **^4^^4^^4^^4^。
### 2. 求解方法:序列蒙特卡洛 (SMC)
**为了解决这个难题,论文使用了 ****序列蒙特卡洛 (SMC)** 方法 ^5^。
**SMC 的核心思想是“逐步逼近”:它不试图一步到位从 **$p_{0}(\theta)$**(先验)跳到 **$p_{d}(\theta)$**(后验),而是构建一系列平滑过渡的中间分布 **$f_{l}(\theta)$** **^6^^6^^6^^6^。
最常用的方法是“退火”或“回火”(tempering),通过一个指数 **$\beta_l$** 来实现:
$$
f_{l}(\theta)\propto L(\theta)^{\beta_{l}}p_{0}(\theta), \quad \text{其中 } 0 = \beta_{0} < \beta_{1} < \dots < \beta_{L} = 1
$$[cite\_start][cite: 174-175]
本文重排并清理了数学公式与格式,确保在常见 Markdown 渲染器中正确显示(提示:需要支持数学渲染的环境,如 VS Code 预览的数学渲染或 GitHub 的内置 KaTeX/MathJax)。
### 1. 问题的起点:贝叶斯模型更新 (Bayesian Model Updating)
在科学和工程中,我们经常有一个数学模型 $G$ 来描述物理系统,但模型中包含未知参数 $\theta$。我们通过实验测量得到一组数据 $d$。贝叶斯更新的目标是利用测量数据 $d$ 反推参数 $\theta$ 的后验分布。
这是通过贝叶斯定理实现的:
$$
p_{d}(\theta) = c_{E}^{-1} \, L(\theta) \, p_{0}(\theta)
$$
其中 $c_E$(模型证据)保证后验归一:
$$
c_{E} = \int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} L(\theta) \, p_{0}(\theta) \, d\theta.
$$
当参数维度很高时,$p_d(\theta)$ 的形状可能非常复杂,直接计算甚至连证据 $c_E$ 的积分都很难。
### 2. 求解方法:序列蒙特卡洛 (SMC)
SMC 的核心思想是“逐步逼近”:不从先验 $p_0(\theta)$ 一步跳到后验 $p_d(\theta)$,而是构建一系列中间分布 $f_l(\theta)$,常见做法是退火/回火(tempering):
$$
f_{l}(\theta) \propto L(\theta)^{\beta_{l}} \, p_{0}(\theta), \quad 0=\beta_0 < \beta_1 < \cdots < \beta_L = 1.
$$
- 当 $\beta_0 = 0$ 时,$f_0(\theta) \propto p_0(\theta)$(先验)。
- 当 $\beta_L = 1$ 时,$f_L(\theta) \propto L(\theta) p_0(\theta)$(后验)。
从 $f_{l-1}$ 到 $f_l$SMC 通常包含三步:
1) 重加权(Reweighting):根据新的 $\beta_l$ 重新计算粒子权重;
2) 重采样(Resampling):复制高权重、淘汰低权重粒子(会导致样本贫化);
3) 移动(Moving):在保持 $f_l$ 不变的前提下,对粒子做若干步 MCMC 以恢复多样性。
### 3. “移动”步骤的经典算法:pCN
pCN(预条件 Crank–Nicolson)在高维问题中表现稳健,尤其适用于高斯先验 $p_0(\theta)=\mathcal{N}(0,I)$ 的情形。其提议为:
$$
v = \sqrt{1-s^{2}}\, \theta_{0} + s\, \xi, \quad \xi \sim \mathcal{N}(0, I), \; s\in[0,1].
$$
对应的 MetropolisHastings 接受率在退火分布 $f_l \propto L^{\beta_l} p_0$ 下可简化为:
$$
\alpha(\theta_{0}, v) = \min\left\{1, \frac{L(v)^{\beta_{l}}}{L(\theta_{0})^{\beta_{l}}} \right\}.
$$
关键点:先验项在接受率中相互抵消,接受与否仅由似然的相对变化决定,这使 pCN 的性能对参数维度不敏感。
然而,pCN 的提议协方差等同于先验(单位阵),在后期 $f_l$ 已经很“窄”且相关性强时,方向上不自适应,效率会下降。
---
### 4. 新算法一:cov-pCN(协方差信息 pCN
思想:在第 $l$ 步,利用带权样本估计目标分布 $f_l$ 的协方差 $\hat{\Sigma}_{f_l}$,并让提议分布适应该协方差结构。
令 $\hat{\Sigma}_{f_l} = W L W^{\top}$ 为特征分解,则广义 pCN 提议为:
$$
v = A\,\theta_0 + s\, W L^{1/2} \xi, \quad \xi \sim \mathcal{N}(0,I),
$$
其中
$$
A = \sqrt{I - s^{2} \hat{\Sigma}_{f_l}} = W\, \sqrt{I - s^{2} L} \, W^{\top}.
$$
这样构造可保持接受率与 pCN 同型:
$$
\alpha(\theta_{0}, v) = \min\left\{1, \frac{L(v)^{\beta_{l}}}{L(\theta_{0})^{\beta_{l}}} \right\},
$$
但提议方向对齐于 $f_l$ 的主协方差方向,混合更高效。
---
### 5. 新算法二:pc-M(主成分 M–H)
思想:高维协方差的主要方差集中在少数主方向上。仅沿主成分方向做随机游走即可。
做特征分解 $\hat{\Sigma}_{f_l} = W L W^{\top}$,取前 $n_r$ 个特征对 $(\rho_k, c_k)$,按权重(如与 $\rho_k$ 相关)随机选方向 $k$,然后:
$$
v = \theta_0 + s\, \rho_k\, c_k\, \xi, \quad \xi \sim \mathcal{N}(0,1).
$$
这是普通随机游走(RWM),接受率为:
$$
\alpha(\theta_0, v) = \min\left\{1, \frac{f_l(v)}{f_l(\theta_0)} \right\}
= \min\left\{1, \frac{L(v)^{\beta_l} \, p_0(v)}{L(\theta_0)^{\beta_l} \, p_0(\theta_0)} \right\}.
$$
---
### 6. 协方差矩阵的估计与递归更新
两种新算法都依赖于“好的”协方差估计 $\hat{\Sigma}_{f_l}$。
1) 初始估计:用重采样前的带权样本估计均值 $\hat{\mu}_{f_l,0}$ 和协方差
$$
\hat{\Sigma}_{f_l,0} = \sum_{j=1}^{J} w_j\, (\theta_j - \hat{\mu}_{f_l,0})(\theta_j - \hat{\mu}_{f_l,0})^{\top}.
$$
2) 递归更新:每获得 $J_a$ 个新样本就批量更新一次,降低特征分解开销($O(n^3)$)。令步长为 $\gamma_{\mathrm{iter}}$,则
$$
\hat{\Sigma}_{f_l,\mathrm{iter}} = \hat{\Sigma}_{f_l,\mathrm{iter-1}} \\
\quad + \; \gamma_{\mathrm{iter}} \Bigg[ \frac{1}{J_a} \sum_{j=1}^{J_a}
(\theta_j - \hat{\mu}_{f_l,\mathrm{iter-1}})(\theta_j - \hat{\mu}_{f_l,\mathrm{iter-1}})^{\top}
\; - \hat{\Sigma}_{f_l,\mathrm{iter-1}} \Bigg].
$$
这是标准的递归平均思想,用 $\gamma$ 平衡新旧信息。
### 7. 实验结论(摘要)
- 高维(如 236 维水文层析)问题中,需要较多退火步数(如约 40)才能从先验到后验;
- 标准 pCN 在较早阶段接受率就显著下降,移动步骤失效;
- cov-pCN 的接受率下降更慢,多数退火步骤中仍能有效“移动”粒子;
- 在难问题上,cov-pCN 的均值误差、失配与不确定性更优。
总之:在 SMC 中引入自适应协方差的 cov-pCN,通常比标准 pCN 更稳健高效,尤其是需要大量退火步骤的复杂高维反问题。
$$